olfactory bulb stereo seq data (Complete Genomics Inc)
Structured Review

Olfactory Bulb Stereo Seq Data, supplied by Complete Genomics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 386 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/olfactory bulb stereo seq data/product/Complete Genomics Inc
Average 97 stars, based on 386 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Probabilistic-graph-based spatial context-aware framework for interpretable spatial omics denoising and augmentation"
Article Title: Probabilistic-graph-based spatial context-aware framework for interpretable spatial omics denoising and augmentation
Journal: Briefings in Bioinformatics
doi: 10.1093/bib/bbaf674
Figure Legend Snippet: Comparative analysis on Stereo-seq MOB and Slide-seqV2 Hippocampus datasets. (a) Raw MOB image with anntated regions (left) and clustering results from baseline models and CadaST (right) with the number of clusters constrained to 7. (b) Visual comparison of the identified spatial domains corresponding to 7 annotated anatomical layers (top), and heatmaps showing the pairwise Jaccard similarity of the top 10 marker genes identified by each method for each specific layer (bottom). (c) Barplots of CHAOS scores across different cluster numbers. (d) Differential expression analysis: heatmap showing DE gene scores after CadaST denoising. Gene expression differences are more distinct following CadaST processing. (e) Slide-seqV2 hippocampal data compared to the Allen Brain Atlas reference. (f) Expression state and denoised results of the representative marker genes for hippocampal regions. (g) Clustering using binarized information only (0 or 1), from CadaST’s genes’ states prediction.
Techniques Used: Comparison, Marker, Quantitative Proteomics, Gene Expression, Expressing
Figure Legend Snippet: High efficiency and scalability of CadaST in embryonic development analysis. (a) Computational efficiency comparison of CadaST, STAGATE, and GraphST on Stereo-seq embryonic datasets. (b) ARI and NMI scores for CadaST, STAGATE, and GraphST on E13.5 and E14.5 sections. (c) Annotated regions of E13.5 section from the original study (left) and domains identified by CadaST and baseline models (right). (d) Comparative visualization of spatial domains in E13.5 identified by the original Stereo-seq study (top) and CadaST (bottom). (e) Magnified view of the spinal cord region segmented by CadaST showing distinct neuroanatomical domains: lateral spinal alar plate (domain 7), spinal cord basal plate (domain 16), and ventricular zone (domain 17), with corresponding marker gene expression ( Nefl, Hoxb8, andHopx ). (f) Annotated regions of E14.5 section from the original study (left) and domains identified by CadaST and baseline models (right). (g) Comparative visualization of spatial domains in E14.5 identified by the original Stereo-seq study (top) and CadaST (bottom). (h) Visualization of tissue-specific marker genes ( Krt5, Tpm2, Col1a1, and Slc25a37 ) in E14.5, showing raw expression, CadaST-predicted spatial patterns, and denoised expression data.
Techniques Used: Comparison, Marker, Gene Expression, Expressing