Review



olfactory bulb stereo seq data  (Complete Genomics Inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol Complete Genomics Inc is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Complete Genomics Inc manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 97

    Structured Review

    Complete Genomics Inc olfactory bulb stereo seq data
    Comparative analysis <t>on</t> <t>Stereo-seq</t> MOB and Slide-seqV2 Hippocampus datasets. (a) Raw MOB image with anntated regions (left) and clustering results from baseline models and CadaST (right) with the number of clusters constrained to 7. (b) Visual comparison of the identified spatial domains corresponding to 7 annotated anatomical layers (top), and heatmaps showing the pairwise Jaccard similarity of the top 10 marker genes identified by each method for each specific layer (bottom). (c) Barplots of CHAOS scores across different cluster numbers. (d) Differential expression analysis: heatmap showing DE gene scores after CadaST denoising. Gene expression differences are more distinct following CadaST processing. (e) Slide-seqV2 hippocampal data compared to the Allen Brain Atlas reference. (f) Expression state and denoised results of the representative marker genes for hippocampal regions. (g) Clustering using binarized information only (0 or 1), from CadaST’s genes’ states prediction.
    Olfactory Bulb Stereo Seq Data, supplied by Complete Genomics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 386 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/olfactory bulb stereo seq data/product/Complete Genomics Inc
    Average 97 stars, based on 386 article reviews
    olfactory bulb stereo seq data - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    97/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Probabilistic-graph-based spatial context-aware framework for interpretable spatial omics denoising and augmentation"

    Article Title: Probabilistic-graph-based spatial context-aware framework for interpretable spatial omics denoising and augmentation

    Journal: Briefings in Bioinformatics

    doi: 10.1093/bib/bbaf674

    Comparative analysis on Stereo-seq MOB and Slide-seqV2 Hippocampus datasets. (a) Raw MOB image with anntated regions (left) and clustering results from baseline models and CadaST (right) with the number of clusters constrained to 7. (b) Visual comparison of the identified spatial domains corresponding to 7 annotated anatomical layers (top), and heatmaps showing the pairwise Jaccard similarity of the top 10 marker genes identified by each method for each specific layer (bottom). (c) Barplots of CHAOS scores across different cluster numbers. (d) Differential expression analysis: heatmap showing DE gene scores after CadaST denoising. Gene expression differences are more distinct following CadaST processing. (e) Slide-seqV2 hippocampal data compared to the Allen Brain Atlas reference. (f) Expression state and denoised results of the representative marker genes for hippocampal regions. (g) Clustering using binarized information only (0 or 1), from CadaST’s genes’ states prediction.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Comparative analysis on Stereo-seq MOB and Slide-seqV2 Hippocampus datasets. (a) Raw MOB image with anntated regions (left) and clustering results from baseline models and CadaST (right) with the number of clusters constrained to 7. (b) Visual comparison of the identified spatial domains corresponding to 7 annotated anatomical layers (top), and heatmaps showing the pairwise Jaccard similarity of the top 10 marker genes identified by each method for each specific layer (bottom). (c) Barplots of CHAOS scores across different cluster numbers. (d) Differential expression analysis: heatmap showing DE gene scores after CadaST denoising. Gene expression differences are more distinct following CadaST processing. (e) Slide-seqV2 hippocampal data compared to the Allen Brain Atlas reference. (f) Expression state and denoised results of the representative marker genes for hippocampal regions. (g) Clustering using binarized information only (0 or 1), from CadaST’s genes’ states prediction.

    Techniques Used: Comparison, Marker, Quantitative Proteomics, Gene Expression, Expressing

    High efficiency and scalability of CadaST in embryonic development analysis. (a) Computational efficiency comparison of CadaST, STAGATE, and GraphST on Stereo-seq embryonic datasets. (b) ARI and NMI scores for CadaST, STAGATE, and GraphST on E13.5 and E14.5 sections. (c) Annotated regions of E13.5 section from the original study (left) and domains identified by CadaST and baseline models (right). (d) Comparative visualization of spatial domains in E13.5 identified by the original Stereo-seq study (top) and CadaST (bottom). (e) Magnified view of the spinal cord region segmented by CadaST showing distinct neuroanatomical domains: lateral spinal alar plate (domain 7), spinal cord basal plate (domain 16), and ventricular zone (domain 17), with corresponding marker gene expression ( Nefl, Hoxb8, andHopx ). (f) Annotated regions of E14.5 section from the original study (left) and domains identified by CadaST and baseline models (right). (g) Comparative visualization of spatial domains in E14.5 identified by the original Stereo-seq study (top) and CadaST (bottom). (h) Visualization of tissue-specific marker genes ( Krt5, Tpm2, Col1a1, and Slc25a37 ) in E14.5, showing raw expression, CadaST-predicted spatial patterns, and denoised expression data.
    Figure Legend Snippet: High efficiency and scalability of CadaST in embryonic development analysis. (a) Computational efficiency comparison of CadaST, STAGATE, and GraphST on Stereo-seq embryonic datasets. (b) ARI and NMI scores for CadaST, STAGATE, and GraphST on E13.5 and E14.5 sections. (c) Annotated regions of E13.5 section from the original study (left) and domains identified by CadaST and baseline models (right). (d) Comparative visualization of spatial domains in E13.5 identified by the original Stereo-seq study (top) and CadaST (bottom). (e) Magnified view of the spinal cord region segmented by CadaST showing distinct neuroanatomical domains: lateral spinal alar plate (domain 7), spinal cord basal plate (domain 16), and ventricular zone (domain 17), with corresponding marker gene expression ( Nefl, Hoxb8, andHopx ). (f) Annotated regions of E14.5 section from the original study (left) and domains identified by CadaST and baseline models (right). (g) Comparative visualization of spatial domains in E14.5 identified by the original Stereo-seq study (top) and CadaST (bottom). (h) Visualization of tissue-specific marker genes ( Krt5, Tpm2, Col1a1, and Slc25a37 ) in E14.5, showing raw expression, CadaST-predicted spatial patterns, and denoised expression data.

    Techniques Used: Comparison, Marker, Gene Expression, Expressing



    Similar Products

    97
    Complete Genomics Inc olfactory bulb stereo seq data
    Comparative analysis <t>on</t> <t>Stereo-seq</t> MOB and Slide-seqV2 Hippocampus datasets. (a) Raw MOB image with anntated regions (left) and clustering results from baseline models and CadaST (right) with the number of clusters constrained to 7. (b) Visual comparison of the identified spatial domains corresponding to 7 annotated anatomical layers (top), and heatmaps showing the pairwise Jaccard similarity of the top 10 marker genes identified by each method for each specific layer (bottom). (c) Barplots of CHAOS scores across different cluster numbers. (d) Differential expression analysis: heatmap showing DE gene scores after CadaST denoising. Gene expression differences are more distinct following CadaST processing. (e) Slide-seqV2 hippocampal data compared to the Allen Brain Atlas reference. (f) Expression state and denoised results of the representative marker genes for hippocampal regions. (g) Clustering using binarized information only (0 or 1), from CadaST’s genes’ states prediction.
    Olfactory Bulb Stereo Seq Data, supplied by Complete Genomics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/olfactory bulb stereo seq data/product/Complete Genomics Inc
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    olfactory bulb stereo seq data - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    97/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Comparative analysis on Stereo-seq MOB and Slide-seqV2 Hippocampus datasets. (a) Raw MOB image with anntated regions (left) and clustering results from baseline models and CadaST (right) with the number of clusters constrained to 7. (b) Visual comparison of the identified spatial domains corresponding to 7 annotated anatomical layers (top), and heatmaps showing the pairwise Jaccard similarity of the top 10 marker genes identified by each method for each specific layer (bottom). (c) Barplots of CHAOS scores across different cluster numbers. (d) Differential expression analysis: heatmap showing DE gene scores after CadaST denoising. Gene expression differences are more distinct following CadaST processing. (e) Slide-seqV2 hippocampal data compared to the Allen Brain Atlas reference. (f) Expression state and denoised results of the representative marker genes for hippocampal regions. (g) Clustering using binarized information only (0 or 1), from CadaST’s genes’ states prediction.

    Journal: Briefings in Bioinformatics

    Article Title: Probabilistic-graph-based spatial context-aware framework for interpretable spatial omics denoising and augmentation

    doi: 10.1093/bib/bbaf674

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparative analysis on Stereo-seq MOB and Slide-seqV2 Hippocampus datasets. (a) Raw MOB image with anntated regions (left) and clustering results from baseline models and CadaST (right) with the number of clusters constrained to 7. (b) Visual comparison of the identified spatial domains corresponding to 7 annotated anatomical layers (top), and heatmaps showing the pairwise Jaccard similarity of the top 10 marker genes identified by each method for each specific layer (bottom). (c) Barplots of CHAOS scores across different cluster numbers. (d) Differential expression analysis: heatmap showing DE gene scores after CadaST denoising. Gene expression differences are more distinct following CadaST processing. (e) Slide-seqV2 hippocampal data compared to the Allen Brain Atlas reference. (f) Expression state and denoised results of the representative marker genes for hippocampal regions. (g) Clustering using binarized information only (0 or 1), from CadaST’s genes’ states prediction.

    Article Snippet: The public datasets used in this study can be accessed from original repositories: the human DLPFC dataset via spatialLIBD ( https://research.libd.org/spatialLIBD/ ); mouse coronal hemibrain and olfactory bulb Stereo-seq data from STOmics DB ( https://db.cngb.org/stomics ); mouse hippocampus Slide-seqV2 data through Squidpy ( https://github.com/scverse/squidpy ); Human breast cancer Visium datasets from 10 \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{upgreek} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} $\times $\end{document} Genomics ( https://support.10xgenomics.com/spatial-gene-expression/datasets ); The spatial ATAC-RNA-seq dataset is available at the Gene Expression Omnibus with accession code GSE205055 ( www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE205055 .

    Techniques: Comparison, Marker, Quantitative Proteomics, Gene Expression, Expressing

    High efficiency and scalability of CadaST in embryonic development analysis. (a) Computational efficiency comparison of CadaST, STAGATE, and GraphST on Stereo-seq embryonic datasets. (b) ARI and NMI scores for CadaST, STAGATE, and GraphST on E13.5 and E14.5 sections. (c) Annotated regions of E13.5 section from the original study (left) and domains identified by CadaST and baseline models (right). (d) Comparative visualization of spatial domains in E13.5 identified by the original Stereo-seq study (top) and CadaST (bottom). (e) Magnified view of the spinal cord region segmented by CadaST showing distinct neuroanatomical domains: lateral spinal alar plate (domain 7), spinal cord basal plate (domain 16), and ventricular zone (domain 17), with corresponding marker gene expression ( Nefl, Hoxb8, andHopx ). (f) Annotated regions of E14.5 section from the original study (left) and domains identified by CadaST and baseline models (right). (g) Comparative visualization of spatial domains in E14.5 identified by the original Stereo-seq study (top) and CadaST (bottom). (h) Visualization of tissue-specific marker genes ( Krt5, Tpm2, Col1a1, and Slc25a37 ) in E14.5, showing raw expression, CadaST-predicted spatial patterns, and denoised expression data.

    Journal: Briefings in Bioinformatics

    Article Title: Probabilistic-graph-based spatial context-aware framework for interpretable spatial omics denoising and augmentation

    doi: 10.1093/bib/bbaf674

    Figure Lengend Snippet: High efficiency and scalability of CadaST in embryonic development analysis. (a) Computational efficiency comparison of CadaST, STAGATE, and GraphST on Stereo-seq embryonic datasets. (b) ARI and NMI scores for CadaST, STAGATE, and GraphST on E13.5 and E14.5 sections. (c) Annotated regions of E13.5 section from the original study (left) and domains identified by CadaST and baseline models (right). (d) Comparative visualization of spatial domains in E13.5 identified by the original Stereo-seq study (top) and CadaST (bottom). (e) Magnified view of the spinal cord region segmented by CadaST showing distinct neuroanatomical domains: lateral spinal alar plate (domain 7), spinal cord basal plate (domain 16), and ventricular zone (domain 17), with corresponding marker gene expression ( Nefl, Hoxb8, andHopx ). (f) Annotated regions of E14.5 section from the original study (left) and domains identified by CadaST and baseline models (right). (g) Comparative visualization of spatial domains in E14.5 identified by the original Stereo-seq study (top) and CadaST (bottom). (h) Visualization of tissue-specific marker genes ( Krt5, Tpm2, Col1a1, and Slc25a37 ) in E14.5, showing raw expression, CadaST-predicted spatial patterns, and denoised expression data.

    Article Snippet: The public datasets used in this study can be accessed from original repositories: the human DLPFC dataset via spatialLIBD ( https://research.libd.org/spatialLIBD/ ); mouse coronal hemibrain and olfactory bulb Stereo-seq data from STOmics DB ( https://db.cngb.org/stomics ); mouse hippocampus Slide-seqV2 data through Squidpy ( https://github.com/scverse/squidpy ); Human breast cancer Visium datasets from 10 \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{upgreek} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} $\times $\end{document} Genomics ( https://support.10xgenomics.com/spatial-gene-expression/datasets ); The spatial ATAC-RNA-seq dataset is available at the Gene Expression Omnibus with accession code GSE205055 ( www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE205055 .

    Techniques: Comparison, Marker, Gene Expression, Expressing